Today I was looking for a command sequence to cut a string in two by predefined
delimiter (e.g. like cut
does). I wanted to get the last field only and all
fields but the last as separate variables.
The proposed solutions I've found suggested using awk
but I don't like it.
Here's a simple solution using cut
and rev
which can extract arbitrary
field counts from the end of the string.
$ echo 'buildvm-08.phx2.fedoraproject.org' | rev | cut -f1 -d. | rev
org
$ echo 'buildvm-08.phx2.fedoraproject.org' | rev | cut -f-2 -d. | rev
fedoraproject.org
$ echo 'buildvm-08.phx2.fedoraproject.org' | rev | cut -f-3 -d. | rev
phx2.fedoraproject.org
$ echo 'buildvm-08.phx2.fedoraproject.org' | rev | cut -f2- -d. | rev
buildvm-08.phx2.fedoraproject
$ echo 'buildvm-08.phx2.fedoraproject.org' | rev | cut -f3- -d. | rev
buildvm-08.phx2
$ echo 'buildvm-08.phx2.fedoraproject.org' | rev | cut -f4- -d. | rev
buildvm-08
The magic here is done by rev
which reverses the order of characters in every
line. It comes with the util-linux-ng package.
Note to Self: util-linux-ng appears to contain more useful commands which I wasn't aware of. Need to RTFM a little bit.
There are comments.
Consider the following scenario:
Just yesterday I hit an issue with the above setup and figured Fedora QA is in a kind of strange situation - we always need the latest but need it conservative enough to run on RHEL 6. See the original thread at kickstart-list.
In this particular case the solution will be to remove the offending code and implement the same functionality in backward-compatible manner. Also add more tests. I will be working on this tomorrow (there's an older patch already).
The BIG question remains though - how do you manage software evolution and still keep it compatible with older execution stacks? Please share your experience in the comments section.
PP: Spoiler - this is part of an ongoing effort to bring open source installation testing expertise (my domain) into Fedora world, plus establish a community supported test infrastructure. More info TBA soon.
There are comments.
image by opensource.com
Recently OpenSource.com published my first article User guide for open source project bug submissions which was inspired by real events.
The comments at the bottom are very interesting. It looks like Fedora needs to make some changes in the bug reporting process and tools.
I've started a discussion on Fedora QA mailing list about this. Follow the thread if you are interested in the topic.
There are comments.
HackFMI starts tonight! During the previous edition of the hackathon I gave one team a special personal gift based on my estimation of their hacker level! Thanks to Vihren Ganev (one of the gift winners) for reminding me about that!
This year I have even bigger items to give to those who think out of the box, who hack their way around and are brave enough to try and change the world through software! I have one Lenovo Thinkpad Business Backpack and one Lowepro D-Res 20 AW Digital Camera Bag (a bit bigger than the one on Amazon, easily fits a BlackBerry Z10) as seen on the pictures below. Plus some small Red Hat branded items.
There are no rules, I will make a decision as I go along. I can give away all items or none. It's up to you! Surprise me!
Tomorrow I will be mentoring the teams who decided to work with Django but I'm happy to talk to anyone who needs help or just wants to grab the cool stuff! See you there!
There are comments.
I was testing Fedora 20 inside a KVM guest this week when the disk space run out. The system was configured to use Btrfs filesystem and this is how to extend it.
First you have to extend the underlying guest storage. On the host I'm using LVM so this is a no brainer:
# pvs
PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
/dev/mapper/luks-f3f6cea1-baba-4aaf-bca8-33a0ec540369 vg_redbull_mini lvm2 a-- 289,11g 134,11g
# lvs
LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Move Log Cpy%Sync Convert
vm_fedora vg_redbull_mini -wi-ao--- 15,00g
# lvextend -L +5G /dev/mapper/vg_redbull_mini-vm_fedora
Extending logical volume vm_fedora to 20,00 GiB
Logical volume vm_fedora successfully resized
# lvs
LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Move Log Cpy%Sync Convert
vm_fedora vg_redbull_mini -wi-ao--- 20,00g
# pvs
PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
/dev/mapper/luks-f3f6cea1-baba-4aaf-bca8-33a0ec540369 vg_redbull_mini lvm2 a-- 289,11g 129,11g
On the VM we have a default Btrfs layout:
# blkid
/dev/vda1: UUID="410ee563-e701-42ff-9d5f-5805dd103e35" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="0000330f-01"
/dev/vda2: UUID="f4addad4-a0fc-482e-ad5a-240864b76f09" TYPE="swap" PARTUUID="0000330f-02"
/dev/vda3: LABEL="fedora" UUID="f0b589ce-061c-4ac3-826e-7f3f8c8a6d30" UUID_SUB="11aa8414-3ce1-4fe7-a506-9a4f91ba5c30" TYPE="btrfs" PARTUUID="0000330f-03"
# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/vda3 13G 11G 1.4G 89% /
devtmpfs 996M 0 996M 0% /dev
tmpfs 1002M 80K 1002M 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs 1002M 668K 1002M 1% /run
tmpfs 1002M 0 1002M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
tmpfs 1002M 16K 1002M 1% /tmp
/dev/vda3 13G 11G 1.4G 89% /home
/dev/vda1 477M 72M 376M 17% /boot
Now power-off (not reboot) and power-on the VM guest so that it sees the new size of the underlying storage. See the fdisk header (line 9 below), vda is now 20GiB!
Before extending the filesystem you have to extend the underlying disk partition! This is the trickiest part. Using fdisk or parted you have to delete the partition and add it again. Make sure to use the SAME starting sector for the new partition (line 33)!
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 | # fdisk /dev/vda
Welcome to fdisk (util-linux 2.24-rc1).
Changes will remain in memory only, until you decide to write them.
Be careful before using the write command.
Command (m for help): p
Disk /dev/vda: 20 GiB, 21474836480 bytes, 41943040 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk label type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x0000330f
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/vda1 * 2048 1026047 512000 83 Linux
/dev/vda2 1026048 5253119 2113536 82 Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/vda3 5253120 31457279 13102080 83 Linux
Command (m for help): d
Partition number (1-3, default 3): 3
Partition 3 is deleted
Command (m for help): n
Partition type:
p primary (2 primary, 0 extended, 2 free)
e extended
Select (default p): p
Partition number (3,4, default 3): 3
First sector (5253120-41943039, default 5253120):
Last sector, +sectors or +size{K,M,G,T,P} (5253120-41943039, default 41943039):
Created a new partition 3 of type 'Linux' and of size 17,5 GiB.
Command (m for help): p
Disk /dev/vda: 20 GiB, 21474836480 bytes, 41943040 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk label type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x0000330f
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/vda1 * 2048 1026047 512000 83 Linux
/dev/vda2 1026048 5253119 2113536 82 Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/vda3 5253120 41943039 18344960 83 Linux
Command (m for help): w
The partition table has been altered.
Calling ioctl() to re-read partition table.
Re-reading the partition table failed.: Device or resource busy
The kernel still uses the old table. The new table will be used at the next reboot or after you run partprobe(8) or kpartx(8).
# partprobe
Error: Partition(s) 3 on /dev/vda have been written, but we have been unable to inform the kernel of the change, probably because it/they are in use. As a result, the old partition(s) will remain in use. You should reboot now before making further changes.
# reboot
|
See lines 36 and 49 above. The new partition has a greater size. After reboot just resize the filesystem and verify the new space has been added
# btrfs filesystem resize max /
Resize '/' of 'max'
# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/vda3 18G 11G 6.4G 63% /
devtmpfs 996M 0 996M 0% /dev
tmpfs 1002M 80K 1002M 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs 1002M 660K 1002M 1% /run
tmpfs 1002M 0 1002M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
tmpfs 1002M 16K 1002M 1% /tmp
/dev/vda3 18G 11G 6.4G 63% /home
/dev/vda1 477M 72M 376M 17% /boot
This is it, more disk space available for the virtual machine. Let me know how it works for you.
There are comments.
Every once in a while ABRT will tell you that reporting is disabled because backtrace is unusable. What it means is that it can't read some of the debugging symbols and the most likely reason for that is debuginfo packages are missing.
To install them first locate the directory containing the files for that particular
crash. Use the executable
file to find out if you are looking into the correct
directory. Then use this one liner to install the missing debuginfo packages.
# pwd
/var/tmp/abrt/ccpp-2013-10-10-15:55:18-15533
# cat backtrace | grep lib | tr -s ' ' | cut -f4 -d' ' | sort | uniq | grep "/" | xargs rpm -qf --qf "%{name}\n" | xargs debuginfo-install -y
There are comments.
Here is my summary of the second Fedora Test Day hosted at init Lab yesterday.
Local attendance was a total disaster, in fact I was testing once again by my own. This time there were more people in the lab, all busy with their daily routines and tasks. There were no people who came for the testing :(. I will have to try different venues in the future and see if the situation improves.
On the testing front I managed to score 5 bugs against GNOME and Fedora. You can see the other test results and bugs on the wiki.
There are two things I didn't like in particular
At one time I was engaged in a discussion about which Bulgarian keyboard layout should be the default in GNOME simply because of GNOME #709799. The default keyboard layout will be Bulgarian (traditional phonetic) aka bg+phonetic.
(16,13,26) rtcm: atodorov: are you bulgarian and/or live in bulgaria?
(16,14,20) rtcm: atodorov: if yes, I wanted to know which keyboard layout most people expect there to be the default
(16,16,34) atodorov: rtcm: I'm a Bulgarian, however I can't tell which one. Both Phonetic and standard (BDS) are common
(16,16,54) atodorov: a safe bet is to go with phonetic I guess.
(16,19,46) rtcm: atodorov: can you tell me which one is it in XKB terms? is it "bg", "bg+bas_phonetic" or "bg+phonetic" ?
(16,20,51) rtcm: they're labeled as "Bulgarian", "Bulgarian (new phonetic)" and "Bulgarian (traditional phonetic)"
(16,21,30) atodorov: bg+phonetic is the traditional phonetic
(16,22,04) atodorov: bg labeled as "Bulgarian" is the standard one I guess. Here we call it BDS after the standardization institute
(16,22,34) atodorov: bg+bas_phonetic is created from the Bulgarian Academy of Science and is not very popular as far as I know. I've never seen it in use
(16,23,15) rtcm: atodorov: all I want to know is what most people would expect? like what does windows do by default? that's a good bet
(16,27,46) atodorov: rtcm: I'm just being told that new Windows releases use yet another layout by default, which is like phonetic but with some characters in new places and people don't like that
(16,27,53) atodorov: my safe bet goes to bg+phonetic
(16,29,05) rtcm: ok, thanks
It is a rare occasion when you get to make a decision that affects a large group of people and I hope you don't hate me for that!
Do you want to see more Fedora Test Days happening in Sofia? Join me and I will organize some more!
There are comments.
Here is a random collection of links I came across this week which appear interesting to me but I don't have time to blog about in details.
If you are wondering how to test different feature branches of your Python application but don't have the resources to create separate test servers this is for you: http://depressedoptimism.com/blog/2013/10/8/making-a-multi-branch-test-server!
Kudos to the python-django-bulgaria Google group for finding this link!
Just read it at http://opensource.com/business/13/10/interview-chris-dibona.
I particularly like the part where he called open source "brutal".
You once called open source “brutal”. What did you mean by that?
...
I think that it is because open source projects are able to only work with the productive people and ignore everyone else. That behavior can come across as very harsh or exclusionary, and that's because it is that: brutally harsh and exclusionary of anyone who isn't contributing.
...
So, I guess what I'm saying is that survival of the fittest as practiced in the open source world is a pretty brutal mechanism, but it works very very well for producing quality software. Boy is it hard on newcomers though...
Yes! Finally!
rhc set-env VARIABLE1=VALUE1 -a myapp
No need for my work around anymore! I will give the new feature a go very soon.
Read more about it at the OpenShift blog: https://www.openshift.com/blogs/taking-advantage-of-environment-variables-in-openshift-php-apps.
Have you found anything interesting this week? Please share in the comments below! Thanks!
There are comments.
Here is a quick summary of the first Fedora Test Day in Sofia I hosted at init Lab today.
Attendance was quite poor, actually nobody else except me participated but almost nobody else visited the hackespace as well. I get that it is a working day and Test Days conflict with regular business hours but this is not going to change anyway. On the other hand where were all the freelancers and non-office job workers who usually hang around in the Lab? I have no idea!
On IRC there was much better activity, 5 or 6 people were testing across Asia, Europe and USA time zones. You can see the test results here. I've started filing quite a few bugs in the morning and continued well into the afternoon. I've managed to file a total of 10 bugs. Some of them were not related to virtualization and some of them turned out to be duplicates or not a bug. I even managed to file 2 duplicate bugs which likely have the same root cause myself :).
I've also experienced two bugs filed by other people: RHBZ #967371 for MATE desktop and RHBZ #1015636 for virt-manager's Save/Restore functionality.
I've tried ARM on x86_64 but that didn't get anywhere near a running system. I will make another post about ARM and what I've discovered there.
The one thing I liked is the test results application. It is not what I'm used to when dealing with RHEL, has far less features but is very fast and easy to use and suits the Test Days participants just fine. And is definitely much easier to use compared to filing results in the wiki.
Overall Fedora 20 virtualization status according to me is pretty good.
I hope to see more attendance on Thursday when we're going to test GNOME 3.10.
There are comments.
Fedora 20 Virtualization and GNOME test days will be tomorrow (8th Oct) and on Thursday (10th Oct)! Local community in Sofia will gather at init Lab! We start at 10:00 and everybody is welcome.
If you have no idea what I'm talking about check my previous posts and the announcement at init Lab's website:
See you there!
There are comments.
Does this look familiar to you ?
No? See SofiaValley and opensource.com.
Either this is a very common front-end mistake (I would blame CSS) or Facebook have screwed up their buttons.
There are comments.
As I mentioned earlier I will organize some Fedora testing in Sofia. Here's an outline of my talk this Saturday and a general guide for anyone who wants to participate.
Fedora Test Days are day long events focused on testing a particular feature in the upcoming Fedora release. At the time of writing they are focused on Fedora 20.
Time and place for two test days will be announced at the end of the week and earlier next week so stay tuned!
There are comments.
To all my readers - sorry for not being able to blog more frequently lately. Here's an easy read about my favourite laptop brand Lenovo and some of their design flaws I've found.
As you can see the X220 and T60 batteries are nearly identical with the notable exception of the connector placement. The end result - I have to purchase yet another battery as a backup for long travel/work on the go. Not what I want.
I wish all Lenovo models had the same batteries so people can swap them around as they wish. Is this too much to ask for? Have you seen another brand which got this right?
I'm using a ThinkPad Mini Dock Series 3 docking station with my X220 laptop. Being a QA engineer for so long I immediately noticed something that wasn't quite right. The buttons on the left and the mechanism next to them are blocking the hot air exhaust from the CPU fan. This model of docking station is made to fit several models of laptops and those which dock in position 2 are less affected from those which dock in possition 1. Mine was not a lucky one.
On the pictures below it is clearly visible that most of the hot air coming out of the CPU fan is blocked.
In order to reduce laptop heating and provide better cooling I decided to remove the 1/2 position switch mechanism. To do that you have to unscrew all screws from the docking station and carefully split the top and bottom halves. The offending piece of plastic is screwed with two tiny screws at the bottom. Once they are removed everything comes off.
Even with this piece removed my laptop still hets up too much! I guess 80 C is just normal for the Core i7 processors :(.
Have you found something not quite right in your hardware design? Please share in the comments.
There are comments.
On September 28th I will be giving a short talk about Fedora Test Days at the regular Linux for Bulgarians conference. I will explain what these are and how one can participate. I will also announce my plans and schedule to organize some Fedora 20 test days locally in Sofia. If you are a fan of Fedora and want to file bugs and kick some developers' ass this is the way to do it!
Other talks include Alexander Shopov's „Oracle's take on NoSQL“ which I wanted to hear since this summer and TBA talks about MicroTik routers.
The conference will take place on September 28th at the French Institute at Sofia University (see map). It starts at 13:00 and my talk should be at the beginning. See you there!
PS: this post was initially written on my BlackBerry Z10 with Penzus Editor - another small step in retiring my laptop.
There are comments.
In my previous post I asked the readers of this blog to pick a bug number from Red Hat's Bugzilla so I can analyze it later.
Radoslav Georgiev decided to step up and selected the Leet bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337
This is a rather old bug against kernel, in particular against the token ring driver. There isn't much info on the bug but it seems the issue is hardware dependent and doesn't reproduce reliably.
Looking at the bug status and history it looks like it was closed without fixing it. Most likely the reason for this was there was no hardware to test, bug was not reproduced and no customers were seeing the issue or were willing to test and work with devel!
If you'd like to see my comments on other interesting bugs just post a link to them in the comments section.
There are comments.
Red Hat's Bugzilla passed the 1 million bugs milestone yesterday! RHBZ #1000000 has been filed by Anton Arapov, a kernel engineer and a very nice guy (I know him btw). I've filed several bugs yesterday but the last one was #999941. A bit too short!
To celebrate this event I dare you to pick some bugs from Bugzilla that you find interesting or frustrating and I will try to analyze and explain them from a QA engineer's point of view. Since I've reported over 1000 bugs and been involved in another close to 5000 I think I will be able to answer almost any question.
Challenge accepted!
There are comments.
I've been having troubles with Twitter lately but this bug is just annoying! Where on Earth is the "code below" ? I've already reported it. Let's see how long it takes for them to fix it!
There are comments.
One thing you need to know when ordering Red Hat subscriptions is your account number. It is available in the drop down menu at the top right corner after you login at https://access.redhat.com.
New accounts don't have an account number. It will be generated after the first subscription activation.
If you need to know more about Red Hat's ordering process just ask me!
There are comments.
Back in February 2013 Russell Beattie has published an article on his blog titled Artisanal Websites: The rise of .io domains for well crafted web services . He has compiled a great deal of sites in the .io domain space with screenshots and links to each individual service. There are lots of interesting ones, so go and check them out!
I'm glad Russell has added Difio as well!
There are comments.
As this year's GUADEC is coming to an end I'm publishing an interesting update from Petr Muller for those who were not able to attend. Petr is a Senior Quality Engineer at Red Hat. His notes were sent to an internal QE mailing list and re-published with permission.
As this year's GUADEC happened in the same building where I have my
other office, I decided to attend. I'm sharing my notes from the two
sessions I consider to be especially interesting for the audience of
this mailing list:
== How to not report your UX bug ==
Speaker: Fabiana Simões
Blog: http://fabianapsimoes.wordpress.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/fabianapsimoes
Do not do this stuff:
* Do not simply present a preferred solution, but describe a problem (a
difficulty you are having, etc.)
* Do not use "This sucks" idiom, not even hidden in false niceties like
"It's not user friendly"
* Do not talk for majority, when you are not entitled to ("most users
would like")
* Do not consider all UX issues as minor: an inability to do stuff is
not a minor issue
What is actually interesting for the designer in a report?
* What were you trying to do?
* Why did you want to do it?
* What did you do?
* What happened?
* What were your expectations?
More notes
* Write as much as needed
* Describe what you see, did and *how you felt*
* Print screen is your friend!
* *Give praise*
== Extreme containment measures: keeping bug reports under control ==
Speaker: Jean-Francois Fortin Tam
Homepage: http://jeff.ecchi.ca
Twitter: https://twitter.com/nekohayo
Discussed the problem lot of OS projects are having: lot of useless
(old, irrelevant, waiting for decision no one wants to make) bug/rfe
reports in their bug tracking systems. Lots of food for thought about
our own projects, internal or external. Clever applications of
principles from personal productivity systems such as GTD and Inbox Zero
for bug tracking.
The talk was mostly an applied version of this blog post, which is worth
reading:
http://jeff.ecchi.ca/blog/2012/10/08/reducing-our-core-apps-software-inventory/
I particularly like the UX bug reporting guide lines. Need to take those into account when reporting UI issues.
I still haven't read the second blog post which also looks interesting although not very applicable to me. After all I'm the person reporting bugs not the one who decides what and when gets fixed.
There are comments.